Carbon Dating Pottery
Worldwide
January/February 2021

Since the 1990s, biogeochemist Richard Evershed of the University of Bristol has been trying to find a way to accurately radiocarbon date ceramic artifacts. But it has taken nearly three decades for technology to catch up with his vision. Archaeologists have been using pottery styles to date artifacts and sites for decades, but these dates had to be confirmed using methods such as radiocarbon dating of associated materials or dendrochronology, the analysis of tree rings. Evershed’s new technique allows researchers to directly radiocarbon date animal fat residue on pottery. His team is able to isolate compounds from samples of pottery that weigh as little as two grams and to detect the minuscule amount of fatty-acid carbon remaining in the residues left by milk, cheese, or meat.
Being able to directly date pottery in this way offers archaeologists a novel option. “It gives you a new anchor point,” says Evershed. As proof of concept, his team used the method at sites with well-established chronologies. One of these is an elevated wooden path that ran through a wetland in Somerset, England, known as the Sweet Track site. Dendrochronology carried out in the 1980s had previously revealed that construction of the track began in the winter of 3807 B.C. Dates from pottery found near the track matched the date obtained through dendrochronology. At the early Neolithic (ca. 6700–5650 B.C.) site of Çatalhöyük in Turkey, dates from four pottery sherds also matched the site’s known chronology. Evershed hopes the technique will allow researchers to learn more about the origins of animal domestication. It could also reveal when changes in prehistoric diets, such as the adoption of dairy products, took place. The best part, says Evershed, is that pottery is found all over the world and, therefore, “it’s a technique that could be applied anywhere, to any culture.”
Advertisement
Peopling the Caribbean, Scythian warrior couple, dogs of the First Nations, and a stonemason’s inside joke
Praying inside the box
Advertisement
January/February 2022
November/December 2021
September/October 2021
July/August 2021
May/June 2021
March/April 2021
January/February 2021
November/December 2020
September/October 2020
July/August 2020
May/June 2020
March/April 2020
January/February 2020
November/December 2019
September/October 2019
July/August 2019
May/June 2019
March/April 2019
January/February 2019
November/December 2018
September/October 2018
July/August 2018
May/June 2018
March/April 2018
January/February 2018
November/December 2017
September/October 2017
July/August 2017
May/June 2017
March/April 2017
January/February 2017
November/December 2016
September/October 2016
July/August 2016
May/June 2016
March/April 2016
January/February 2016
November/December 2015
September/October 2015
July/August 2015
May/June 2015
March/April 2015
January/February 2015
November/December 2014
September/October 2014
July/August 2014
May/June 2014
March/April 2014
January/February 2014
November/December 2013
September/October 2013
July/August 2013
May/June 2013
March/April 2013
January/February 2013
November/December 2012
September/October 2012
July/August 2012
May/June 2012
March/April 2012
January/February 2012
November/December 2011
September/October 2011
July/August 2011
May/June 2011
March/April 2011
January/February 2011
Advertisement